Well he used newtons first law, supposedly, which is in basic terms is that if something is moving in a straight line then it will not stop moving unless acted on by an ‘external force’ however if it is stationary (not moving) they will no longer be able to move.
V
I get that he won, but what I don’t get is what does his explanation have to do with anything? Did he just overwhelm her with facts that he knew?
E"
Well he used newtons first law, supposedly, which is in basic terms is that if something is moving in a straight line then it will not stop moving unless acted on by an ‘external force’ however if it is stationary (not moving) they will no longer be able to move.